Tuesday, November 5, 2019

The Coffee House Conundrum-Part-1 (Dr. Y.V. Rao)


The Coffee House Conundrum-1
                                                 Dr. Yerneni Venkateswara Rao
M.Sc., Ph. D
Retired Principal
Akkineni Nageswara Rao College
GUDIVADA- A.P
yernenivrao@gmail.com


The Coffee House in College Street in North Calcutta is one of Calcutta’s landmarks and meeting place of the city’s intelligentsia. Intellectuals like writers, poets, sculptors, journalists, academicians and students routinely sit over a cup of coffee customarily shared among at least three of them and debate for hours Jean Paul Sartre’s existentialism, Salvador Dali’s surrealism, Karl Marx’s Das Capital and hundred other things. Presently, the Coffee House run by a workers cooperative for the last several years, is on the boil with the Coffee House Consumers Forum picketing it to protest a sharp hike in the price of coffee and eatables. Each side accuses the other of not seeing reason. The Forum members usually full of ideas and chronically short of cash think the members of the cooperative are acting the role of owners while the latter think that they are getting paid a pittance by the restaurant and they deserve a better deal which is denied to them y the former’s obstinacy. They are rigid in their respective stances.
Intellectuals have instant solutions for conflict resolution especially when workers are locked up in a struggle against corporate managements. How they solve this one is bound to be of considerable interest and import.   (The Hindu May 6, 1997)
B1-70
Just as there is a distinction between Caesar’s wife and others in that the former , by virtue of her being willy-nilly an object in a critical gazing gallery, should not only be chaste but should also be above suspicion , so there is a clear distinction between private citizens and public servants; while it is enough for the former to be free from the taint of corruption, it is necessary for the latter to be not only not corrupt but also known to be so.
B1-71
Even the most beautiful humanistic ideals have a distressing tendency to collapse on their first encounter with reality; equality, liberty and fraternity, the trinity of ideals that powered the French Revolution and that still sway the liberal intellectuals of today are a case in point.
Where equality reigns supreme, liberty and with it, fraternity falls by the way side because of the ineluctable restrictions to be imposed on the latter; where liberty blossoms fully which is possible only in a regime of restricted, or better still, no equality, the latter together with fraternity withers and wilts. Lack of either or both leads to social stresses and tensions that will work against the essential cooperativeness of the society and in the absence of social cohesion, fraternity will merely be a myth or a figment of imagination having no foundation/roots in reality.
Fraternity, however, flourishes but only in the dual company of equality and liberty which is impossible because of their mutual antagonism. Thus, in practice, the triad of ideals is nothing if not totally incompatible and mutually exclusive. So ennobling a trio of ideals and yet so impossible of attainment in actual practice. How very tantalizing!

B1-107
Where fraternity rooted in love and trust reigns supreme, liberty and equality blossom like flowers and fill the air/atmosphere with their aroma/fragrance. So it is love and trust radiating from individual human hearts that can set the process of social transformation in motion. In other words, without revolutionizing the consciousness of each individual and without bringing about a genuine change of heart and mind, it is impossible to ensure the translation of any and every utopia, based, in one way or the other, on this trinity of values into a concrete reality. The belief that fundamental changes in society could only occur through the conversion of people’s hearts was the basis of Gandhiji’s philosophy and the reason for choosing the human heart as the field for waging all his battles. For where the causes of disunion are, there the remedies must be sought. We should remember that love compels love and that strength conciliates strength in the wise words of Sri Aurobindo.
B1-108
Be it a family or a society, to the extent to which its members relate to one another on the basis of love and trust as living truths, as natural feelings and not as mere concepts, ideas or values, to that extent, it is perfect or happy.
B1-72
Every professional -- be he a lawyer , doctor , architect, financial or management consultant or a consulting expert in any other area of human endeavour, following the golden rule that one should do as would be done by,  should place himself in the position of  his client and ask himself what is just and right in that situation and the answer he would get would be ethical. If any professional were to forsake principles of ethics and follow pecuniary predilections , he would end up converting himself into a petty trader and his profession into a business, for the latter is primarily a preoccupation with personal gain.
B1-73
Great teachers like the Upanishadic seers , the Buddha , Jesus Christ and Ramakrishna Paramahamsa took recourse to tales, anecdotes and parables because , for one thing , everyone loves to listen to a story and for another and for another, tales, straight forward as well as allegorical, tell and instruct through entertainment while parables and anecdotes, the former being easy on the ear and multi dimensional in their penetration and the latter being all too human in scope and captivating by nature convey abstruse truths and profound verities in a delectable form and arresting fashion.
  The humour-laced tales and parables told by Ramakrishna, the story teller par excellence and his homely illustrations are elucidations of one and only thing-how to attain God—how “to strive, to seek , to find and not to yield.”
B1-74
Telling truth is so much simpler and easier than telling untruth , for truth being self evident like the sun and the moon , beckons to us whereas falsehood being non existent has to be invented out of airy nothingness and propped up on a pedestal of plausibility reinforced and buttressed by further falsehood in order that it be sustained during its ephemeral existence. Yet strangely, so many so readily take recourse to a mass of untruth and a farrago of falsehood with the all the attendant perils of failure and ultimate perdition.
This is so despite the fact that Socrates as long as 2500 years ago not only declared “that truth is the way that leads directly to God” but also “pursued the trail of truth like a bloodhound all through his life.” What is equally noteworthy is the fact that “ falsehood always falls apart while truth always holds together.” Worse, truth has the nasty habit of surfacing when we least expect it and that too at the most unanticipated  places.
  Even from a practical point of view , if one thinks of all the labour  it takes to first invent and then sustain untruth , one will realize what an amazing labour saving device truth is.
With so many obvious advantages in pursuing truth, why do people shun it and gravitate so readily towards lies, half truths and untruths? What impels them  to do so? Maybe its the kick one gets out of a creative act or the thrill of being able to manipulate others albeit fleetingly or both. The kick one gets on seeing the flowering of one’s creative urge or impulse or the thrill of being able to influence and control the thinking and behaviour of others even if for a moment, is not possible if one sticks to truth telling. Additionally, lies runs sprints spectacularly to their doom whereas the truth runs marathons staidly to its inevitable triumph and people anyday, plumb for cheering a sprinter than a marathoner , for they know not the inevitable result of either.
  Against this backdrop, isn’t it amazing that people in general and particularly “ political parties, ideologues, propagandists, spin doctors , political hucksters and loose cannons , not to mention astrologers” so readily and so often resort to the dirty habit of/ addiction to camouflaging the truth in a mass of , if not burying it under a mound of lies, untruth and downright falsehood in pursuit of their immediate interests and short range goals only to rue in the end the disastrous consequences of such a short sighted approach?
B1-75
With all the amazing technological advances in medical science , which possibly have outpaced the need , often times the doctors have succeeded not so much in prolonging life as in extending the process of death, that too, at a cost draining away a fortune  or worse still, not allowing one to die in peace and with dignity , thereby raising ethical questions of urgent nature, both for medical profession as also the patients and their relatives like “ can man act God in keeping the heart going for no purpose whatsoever when he is forbidden from acting God in terminating life for whatever reason?” Alternatively “ can one benefit the patient as a whole by making him dead?”, as in fact asked by Prof. Leon Kass of the University of Chicago who is a staunch opponent to euthanasia (pleasant death). “To be better off dead is logical nonsense unless death is not death but instead a get away to a new and better life beyond”, is the rider he himself added/adduced.
  For a Hindu believing in reincarnation , death is not certainly the end of everything . At a ‘viable dieable age’ instead of replacing  “a suffering human person with an unconscious organization of animal reflexes” which is what happens when anodynes and anaesthetics are administered to end pain and suffering—when these invade human existence consciousness contracts (philosopher Kavace Kallen)—it is better to euthanasise.
Legal or illegal, personally I would be grateful to whoever helps terminate my life compassionately, if and when I need such help in order to escape from the ravages of either an intractable disease or the “helpless decrepitude of excessive old age” for I would rather die than live helplessly. Death is over quickly. All this, of course, in the unlikely event of my missing the kiss of the great leveller despite its definite possibility—MI , which had a go at me twice already and failed, will I hope succeed next time, whenever that be—before any such need arises. Just as I am not afraid to die , I am not eager to embrace death either. I will be happy to work until I drop. And the only wish I have is I shouldn’t know in advance when its going to happen. I will be happy to work until I pass through the great gate to the beyond.
Liberty to seek release from pain in death when pain becomes unbearable and when there is no possible remedy or redress deserves to be seriously considered for inclusion of the list of fundamental rights enshrined in our constitution.
B1-76
Sycophancy, ‘the cult of self inflicted servility’ , is both small change and big money/bucks little men buy their admittance with to the portals of the rich and the famous.
B1-77
Sycophancy is a handy tool little men use with devastating efficacy/efficiency , first to pull themselves up the power ladder  and then to don the mantle of bigwigs through a time-honoured stratagem : first, they foist/insinuate themselves into unsuspecting powercentres, next they latch on to a prospective winner in the power game and then project a larger than life image of their protagonist by creating a halo around him/her through a cleverly crafted and adroitly sequenced propaganda consisting of misinformation, hype , drumbeating and media manipulation with carefully concealed but occasional indulgence in skilful self publicity and self promotion on the side and finally start throwing their weight about posing as the power behind the throne which climaxes/culminates in their becoming real power wielders as their protagonists’ susceptibility to sycophancy wears him down.
B1-78
Tears and grief are but teardrops; tears in sympathy are pearls of great price (pearls of rare/ unparalleled beauty) for they elevate and ennoble life.
B1-79
It is logic that has to conform to life and not the other way round; what is logical at one level of our being turns out to be fictitious at another. To the extent it fits into the larger picture of life , logic has validity. Life, being of the nature of truth, strides on spontaneously and freely unmindful of – or is it in defiance of ?—logic and its demands for conformity. This simple/plain fact if not kept in view, can be the cause of half of our troubles in life.
B1-80
Life, like truth being free from the compulsions of logic can afford to be as it is and can flow naturally and effortlessly whereas fiction has to constantly struggle to conform to the dictates of logic by making adjustments so it may appear plausible. This being the case , its small wonder that often, life and truth are stranger than fiction. “Destiny , after all, has more resources than the most imaginative composer of fiction”, as averred by Frank Frankfurt Moore. Concurs JBS Haldane , “the universe is not queerer than we imagine, it is queerer than we CAN imagine.”
                                                                                                            
One whose past acts, present deeds and future designs had better be kept under close wraps is a bloke with a black soul. He can’t stand even the few streaks of silver in his hair that age gifts as a mark of maturity for fear that they may betray him by drawing attention to the contrastive colour of his soul. So he dyes them black.
B1-82
If Goldsmith, according to Dr Johnson, touched nothing which he did not adorn, politicians of India have touched nothing which they have not debased or desecrated or both.



No comments: